In
Richard Straub’s article, “Responding—Really Responding—to Other Student’s
Writing,” he talks about how readers need to read and respond to an essay so
that the writer can learn from and revise his or her essay. There needs to be a
median for the reader. They must find a balance of criticism and neglecting the
essay so that both the writer can benefit from the readers responses to better
his or her essay. While the reader will provide constructive criticism, the
reader must also give encouragement so that the writer can have the confidence
to push themselves beyond their comfort level of writing. It is important that
before the reader begins reading and analyzing a paper they must know what type
of writing assignment has been assigned, the writers intended message, and how
far along the drafting process the writer is in. The stage that the writer is
in will reflect the style of feedback given. In the early stages of a paper the
reader will look for a broader understanding of the paper itself but if the
paper were to be in its near complete or latter stages then the reader will
more likely look more for grammatical and punctuation errors. As a reader they
must be aware of their status as a reader and not think too highly of
themselves. For instance, the peers or equals of the writer shouldn’t be too
hard on the writer but should rather be honest with the quality of the paper. For
every part critiqued by the reader then the same amount of confident boosters
or signs of encouragement should be given. Also the reader should be specific
with their advice to truly allow the writer to make specific revisions for
clarity.
No comments:
Post a Comment